Wood v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

United States Court of Federal Claims·Decided December 16, 2024·No. 24-0130V·Unpublished

Opinion

In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 24-130V

BROOKE WOOD, Chief Special Master Corcoran

Petitioner, Filed: November 5, 2024 v.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES,

Respondent.

Nathan Joseph Marchese, Shannon Law Group, Woodridge, IL, for Petitioner.

Madylan Louise Yarc, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES 1

On January 26, 2024, Brooke Wood filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq. 2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that that she suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (“SIRVA”), a defined Table injury, after receiving an influenza (“flu”) vaccine on October 24, 2022. Petition at 1 ¶¶ 5, 34-35. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.

On September 25, 2024, a ruling on entitlement was issued, finding Petitioner entitled to compensation for SIRVA. On November 4, 2024, Respondent filed a proffer on award of compensation (“Proffer”) indicating Petitioner should be awarded $92,500.00 in pain and suffering, and $1,952.57 in past unreimbursable expenses. Proffer at 1-2. In the Proffer, Respondent represented that Petitioner agrees with the proffered award. Id.

1 Because this Decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action taken in this case, it must be made

publicly accessible and will be posted on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, and/or at https://www.govinfo.gov/app/collection/uscourts/national/cofc, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2018) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the Decision will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access.

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease

of citation, all section references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2018). Based on the record as a whole, I find that Petitioner is entitled to an award as stated in the Proffer.

Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Proffer, I award Petitioner a lump sum payment of $94,452.57 (representing $92,500.00 in pain and suffering, and $1,952.57 in past unreimbursable expenses) in the form of a check payable to Petitioner. This amount represents compensation for all damages that would be available under Section 15(a).

The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this decision. 3

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Brian H. Corcoran Brian H. Corcoran Chief Special Master

3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice

renouncing the right to seek review.

2 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

BROOKE WOOD,

Petitioner, No. 24-130V Chief Special Master Corcoran (SPU) v. ECF

RESPONDENT’S PROFFER ON AWARD OF COMPENSATION 1

On January 26, 2024, Brooke Wood (“petitioner”) filed a petition for compensation under

the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-1 to 34 (“Vaccine Act”

or “Act”), alleging that she suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration

(“SIRVA”), as defined in the Vaccine Injury Table, following administration of an influenza

(“flu”) vaccine on October 24, 2022. Petition at 1.

On September 25, 2024, respondent file his Vaccine Rule 4(c) report, concluding that

petitioner suffered a SIRVA as defined by the Vaccine Injury Table, within the Table timeframe,

and with no apparent alternative cause. ECF No. 21. The same day, Chief Special Master

Corcoran issued a Ruling on Entitlement, finding that petitioner is entitled to compensation for

her SIRVA. ECF No. 22.

1 This Proffer does not include attorneys’ fees and costs, which the parties intend to address after the Damages Decision is issued. 1 I. Items of Compensation

A. Pain and Suffering

Based on the evidence of record, respondent proffers that petitioner should be awarded

$92,500.00 in pain and suffering. See 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a)(4). Petitioner agrees.

B. Past Unreimbursable Expenses

Evidence supplied by petitioner documents that she incurred past unreimbursable

expenses related to her vaccine-related injury. Respondent proffers that petitioner should be

awarded past unreimbursable expenses in the amount of $1,952.57. See 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-

15(a)(1)(B). Petitioner agrees.

These amounts represent all elements of compensation to which petitioner is entitled

under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a). Petitioner agrees.

II. Form of the Award

Petitioner is a competent adult. Evidence of guardianship is not required in this case.

Respondent recommends that the compensation provided to petitioner should be made through a

lump sum payment as described below, and requests that the Chief Special Master’s damages

decision and the Court’s judgment award the following: 2 a lump sum payment of $94,452.57, in

the form of a check payable to petitioner.

III. Summary of Recommended Payment Following Judgment

Lump sum payable to petitioner, Brooke Wood: $94,452.57

2 Should petitioner die prior to the entry of judgment, respondent reserves the right to move the Court for appropriate relief. In particular, respondent would oppose any award for future medical expenses, future pain and suffering, and future lost wages. 2 Respectfully submitted,

BRIAN M. BOYNTON Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General

C. SALVATORE D’ALESSIO Director Torts Branch, Civil Division

HEATHER L. PEARLMAN Deputy Director Torts Branch, Civil Division

VORIS E. JOHNSON Assistant Director Torts Branch, Civil Division

s/Madylan L. Yarc MADYLAN L. YARC Trial Attorney Torts Branch, Civil Division U.S. Department of Justice P.O. Box 146 Benjamin Franklin Station Washington, D.C. 20044-0146 Madylan.L.Yarc@usdoj.gov Tel.: (202) 742-6376

DATED: November 4, 2024

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wood v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, (uscfc 2024).

Wood v. Secretary of Health and Human Services (Wood v. Secretary of Health and Human Services) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 300aa
42 U.S.C. § 300aa
§ 300aa-
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-
§ 300aa-1
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-1
§ 300aa-10
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-10
§ 300aa-15
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a)(4)
Purposes
44 U.S.C. § 3501
§ 300a
42 U.S.C. § 300a