Wood v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

CourtUnited States Court of Federal Claims
DecidedMarch 11, 2025
Docket22-1924V
StatusUnpublished

This text of Wood v. Secretary of Health and Human Services (Wood v. Secretary of Health and Human Services) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Federal Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wood v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, (uscfc 2025).

Opinion

In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 22-1924V

SAKINAH WOOD, Chief Special Master Corcoran

Petitioner, Filed: January 30, 2025 v.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES,

Respondent.

Mark Theodore Sadaka, Law Offices of Sadaka Associates, LLC, Englewood, NJ, for Petitioner.

Felicia Langel, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

DECISION ON JOINT STIPULATION 1

On December 30, 2022, Sakinah Wood filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq. 2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner received human papillomavirus (“HPV”) vaccinations on December 2, 2021 and February 4, 2022, and alleges that she suffered a Table injury - shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (“SIRVA”), within the time period set forth in the Vaccine Injury Table following administration of the HPV vaccine. Stipulation, filed at January 27, 2025, at ¶¶ 1-2, 4; see Petition at 1-3. Petitioner further alleges that she received the vaccines in the United States, that she suffered the residual effects of her injury for more than six months, and that there has been no prior award or settlement of a civil action on her behalf as a result of her injury. Stipulation at ¶¶ 3-5; see Petition at ¶¶ 2, 4, 11. “Respondent denies that [P]etitioner sustained a SIRVA injury; denies that the HPV vaccine caused her alleged shoulder injury, or any other injury or condition; and

1 Because this Decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action taken in this case, it must be made publicly accessible and will be posted on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, and/or at https://www.govinfo.gov/app/collection/uscourts/national/cofc, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2018) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the Decision will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access. 2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all section references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2018). denies that her current condition is a sequela of a vaccine-related injury.” Stipulation at ¶ 6.

Nevertheless, on January 27, 2025, the parties filed the attached joint stipulation, stating that a decision should be entered awarding compensation. I find the stipulation reasonable and adopt it as my decision awarding damages, on the terms set forth therein.

Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Stipulation, I award the following compensation:

A lump sum of $18,000.00 to be paid through an ACH deposit to Petitioner’s counsel’s IOLTA account for prompt disbursement to Petitioner. Stipulation at ¶ 8. This amount represents compensation for all items of damages that would be available under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a). Id.

I approve the requested amount for Petitioner’s compensation. In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this decision. 3

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Brian H. Corcoran Brian H. Corcoran Chief Special Master

3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice renouncing the right to seek review.

2 ·mes1gn uocument 1u: tst-4t,;4/U1-t:it-~A-4~~A-~U1A-o1~~U~14Ats1::>

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

SAKINAH WOOD,

Petitioner, No. 22-1924V Chief Special Master Corcoran V. ECF

STIPULATION

The parties hereby stipulate to the following matters:

1. Sakinah Wood ("petitioner") filed a petition for vaccine compensation under the

National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-10 to 34 (the "Vaccine

Program"). The petition seeks compensation for injuries allegedly related to petitioner's receipt

of a human papilloma virus ("HPV") vaccine, which is contained in the Vaccine Injury Table

(the "Table"), 42 C.F.R. § 100.3(a)

2. Petitioner received HPV vaccinations on December 2, 2021, and February 4, 2022.

3. The vaccines were administered within the United States.

4. Petitioner alleges that she sustained a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration

("SIRVA") within the time period set forth in the Table following administration of the HPV

vaccine. Petitioner further alleges that she suffered the residual effects of her alleged injury for

more than six months.

5. Petitioner represents that there has been no prior award or settlement of a civil action

for damages on her behalf as a result of the alleged injury.

·he signed document can be validated at https://app.vinesign.comNerify 6. Respondent denies that petitioner sustained a SJRVA injury; denies that the HPV

vaccine caused her alleged shoulder injury, or any other injury or condition; and denies that her

current condition is a sequela of a vaccine-related injury.

7. Maintaining their above-stated positions, the parties nevertheless now agree that the

issues between them shall be settled and that a decision should be entered awarding the

compensation described in paragraph 8 of this Stipulation.

8. As soon as practicable after an entry of judgment reflecting a decision consistent with

the tenns of this Stipulation, and after petitioner has filed an election to receive compensation

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-2l(a)(I), the Secretary of Health and Human Services will issue

the following vaccine compensation payment:

A lump sum payment of $18,000.00 to be paid through an ACH deposit to petitioner's counsel's IOLTA account for prompt disbursement to petitioner. This amount represents compensation for all damages that would be available under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a). 9. As soon as practicable after the entry of judgment on entitlement in this case, and after

petitioner has filed both a proper and timely election to receive compensation pursuant to 42

U.S.C. § 300aa-2l(a)(I), and an application, the parties will submit to further proceedings before

the special master to award reasonable attorneys' fees and costs incurred in proceeding upon this

petition.

I 0. Petitioner and her attorney represent that compensation to be provided pursuant to

this Stipulation is not for any items or services for which the Vaccine Program is not primarily

liable under 42 U.S.C.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 300aa
42 U.S.C. § 300aa
§ 300aa-10
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-10
§ 300aa-15
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a)
§ 300aa-2l
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-2l(a)(I)
§ 300aa-l
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-l
Purposes
44 U.S.C. § 3501
§ 300a
42 U.S.C. § 300a

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Wood v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wood-v-secretary-of-health-and-human-services-uscfc-2025.