Wood v. Mutual Redevelopment Houses, Inc.

S.D. New York

Wood v. Mutual Redevelopment Houses, Inc.

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided January 20, 2023·No. 1:22-cv-09493·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK TZVEE WOOD, et al, Plaintiff, 22-CV-9493 (LTS) -against- ORDER OF DISMISSAL MUTUAL REDVELOPMENT HOUSES, INC., et al., Defendants. LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN, Chief United States District Judge: By order dated November 23, 2022, the Court directed Plaintiffs, within thirty days, each to submit a completed request to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP application”) or pay the $402.00 in fees required to file a civil action in this court. That order specified that failure to comply would result in dismissal of the complaint. Plaintiffs have not filed IFP applications or paid the fees. Accordingly, the complaint is dismissed without prejudice. See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914, 1915. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Cf. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962) (holding that an appellant demonstrates good faith when he seeks review of a nonfrivolous issue). The Court directs the Clerk of Court to enter judgment in this case. SO ORDERED. Dated: January 20, 2023 New York, New York

/s/ Laura Taylor Swain LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN Chief United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK TZVEE WOOD, et al, Plaintiff, 22-CV-9493 (LTS) -against- ORDER OF DISMISSAL MUTUAL REDVELOPMENT HOUSES, INC., et al., Defendants. LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN, Chief United States District Judge: By order dated November 23, 2022, the Court directed Plaintiffs, within thirty days, each to submit a completed request to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP application”) or pay the $402.00 in fees required to file a civil action in this court. That order specified that failure to comply would result in dismissal of the complaint. Plaintiffs have not filed IFP applications or paid the fees. Accordingly, the complaint is dismissed without prejudice. See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914, 1915. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Cf. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962) (holding that an appellant demonstrates good faith when he seeks review of a nonfrivolous issue). The Court directs the Clerk of Court to enter judgment in this case. SO ORDERED. Dated: January 20, 2023 New York, New York

/s/ Laura Taylor Swain LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN Chief United States District Judge

Wood v. Mutual Redevelopment Houses, Inc., (S.D.N.Y. 2023).

Pincite

Wood v. Mutual Redevelopment Houses, Inc. (Wood v. Mutual Redevelopment Houses, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related