Wood v. McCullough

45 F.R.D. 41, 12 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 781, 1968 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12696
District Court, S.D. New York·Decided August 8, 1968·No. No. 67 Civ. 3830·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

POLLACK, District Judge.

Three defendant physicians in this malpractice action object to identical written interrogatories which plaintiff has addressed to each of them respectively under Rule 33, F.R.Civ.P. The interrogatories, numbered 7, 8 and 9, seek the particulars of any other legal action in which any of the three physicians was involved as a party.

Other legal proceedings instituted by or against these physician defendants are not relevant to the potential issues for trial in this case. In the exercise of the Court’s discretion, the objections to Interrogatories 7, 8 and 9 propounded by the plaintiff are sustained. See, Cox v. Livingston, 41 F.R.D. 344 (S.D.N.Y.1967).

So ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wood v. McCullough, 45 F.R.D. 41, 12 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 781, 1968 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12696 (S.D.N.Y. 1968).

45 F.R.D. 41 (Wood v. McCullough) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Marker v. Union Fidelity Life Insurance
125 F.R.D. 121 (M.D. North Carolina, 1989)
Fuller v. Jackson
50 Pa. D. & C.3d 628 (Cumberland County Court of Common Pleas, 1987)
McClain v. Mack Trucks, Inc.
85 F.R.D. 53 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1979)
Miller v. Doctor's General Hospital
76 F.R.D. 136 (W.D. Oklahoma, 1977)
City of Los Angeles v. Superior Court
33 Cal. App. 3d 778 (California Court of Appeal, 1973)