Wood v. McCullough
This text of 45 F.R.D. 41 (Wood v. McCullough) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Three defendant physicians in this malpractice action object to identical written interrogatories which plaintiff has addressed to each of them respectively under Rule 33, F.R.Civ.P. The interrogatories, numbered 7, 8 and 9, seek the particulars of any other legal action in which any of the three physicians was involved as a party.
Other legal proceedings instituted by or against these physician defendants are not relevant to the potential issues for trial in this case. In the exercise of the Court’s discretion, the objections to Interrogatories 7, 8 and 9 propounded by the plaintiff are sustained. See, Cox v. Livingston, 41 F.R.D. 344 (S.D.N.Y.1967).
So ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
45 F.R.D. 41, 12 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 781, 1968 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12696, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wood-v-mccullough-nysd-1968.