Wonforo Realty, Inc. v. Wachtel

13 Misc. 2d 461, 176 N.Y.S.2d 521
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided June 19, 1958·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Since the tenant was in possession under an unexpired lease and not as a statutory tenant, the landlord could evict for violation of an obligation of the lease only by exercising the right to terminate the lease given by the conditional limitation clause (Almarine Realty Corp. v. Stern, 203 Misc. 190; Parkton Estates v. Metcalf, 72 N. Y. S. 2d 324; 89-09 Sutphin Corp. v. Scarinzi, 187 Misc. 536). The landlord did not proceed under that clause, even assuming its applicability to the situation shown.

The final order should be modified so that the petition is dismissed without prejudice to the landlord’s right, if any, to proceed under the conditional limitation clause, and as modified affirmed, without costs.

Concur — Hoestadter, J. P., Hecht and Tilzer, JJ.

Final order modified, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wonforo Realty, Inc. v. Wachtel, 13 Misc. 2d 461, 176 N.Y.S.2d 521 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1958).

13 Misc. 2d 461 (Wonforo Realty, Inc. v. Wachtel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

89-09 Sutphin Corp. v. Scarinzi
187 Misc. 536 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1946)
Almarine Realty Corp. v. Stern
203 Misc. 190 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1952)