Womer v. Hilliker
869 A.2d 482, 582 Pa. 92, 2005 Pa. LEXIS 325
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided February 23, 2005·No. Appeal No. 957 MAL 2004·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
[93]*93 ORDER
AND NOW, this 23rd day of February 2005, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED to whether the Superior Court erred in finding that petitioner alleged sufficient facts to warrant opening the judgment of non pros, where respondent failed to comply with the certifícate of merit requirement set forth in Pa.R.C.P. 1042.3. In addressing this issue, the parties shall also address the question of whether Rule 1042.3 should be deemed subject to equitable exceptions.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Womer v. Hilliker, 869 A.2d 482, 582 Pa. 92, 2005 Pa. LEXIS 325 (Pa. 2005).
869 A.2d 482 (Womer v. Hilliker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Womer v. Hilliker
908 A.2d 269 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2006)
Doble v. Moses Taylor Hospital
78 Pa. D. & C.4th 449 (Lackawanna County Court of Common Pleas, 2006)