Womer v. Hilliker

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Womer v. Hilliker

869 A.2d 482

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedFebruary 23, 2005

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 869 A.2d 482 (Womer v. Hilliker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Womer v. Hilliker, 869 A.2d 482 (Pa. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 23rd day of February 2005, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED to whether the Superior Court erred in finding that petitioner alleged sufficient facts to warrant opening the judgment of non pros, where respondent failed to comply with the certificate of merit requirement set forth in Pa.R.C.P. 1042.3. In addressing this issue, the parties shall also address the question of whether Rule 1042.3 should be deemed subject to equitable exceptions.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 23rd day of February 2005, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED to whether the Superior Court erred in finding that petitioner alleged sufficient facts to warrant opening the judgment of non pros, where respondent failed to comply with the certificate of merit requirement set forth in Pa.R.C.P. 1042.3. In addressing this issue, the parties shall also address the question of whether Rule 1042.3 should be deemed subject to equitable exceptions.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

869 A.2d 482, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/womer-v-hilliker-pa-2005.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack