Wolverine Soap Co. v. Sellers
97 S.E. 890, 23 Ga. App. 232, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 54
Opinion
This case has been here for review twice before. 13 Ga. App. 380 (79 S. E. 246); 19 Ga. App. 295 (91 S. E. 489). The question now raised is upon exceptions to the judgment overruling the plaintiff’s motion for a new trial, which motion was based on the general grounds only. The verdict was not without evidence to support it, and, the learned trial judge having approved the verdict, it was not error to overrule the motion for a new trial.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Wolverine Soap Co. v. Sellers, 97 S.E. 890, 23 Ga. App. 232, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 54 (Ga. Ct. App. 1919).
97 S.E. 890 (Wolverine Soap Co. v. Sellers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Wolverine Soap Co. v. Sellers
79 S.E. 246 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1913)
Sellers v. Wolverine Soap Co.
91 S.E. 489 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1917)