Wolverine Soap Co. v. Sellers

97 S.E. 890, 23 Ga. App. 232, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 54
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJanuary 15, 1919
Docket9681
StatusPublished

This text of 97 S.E. 890 (Wolverine Soap Co. v. Sellers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wolverine Soap Co. v. Sellers, 97 S.E. 890, 23 Ga. App. 232, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 54 (Ga. Ct. App. 1919).

Opinion

Luke, J.

This case has been here for review twice before. 13 Ga. App. 380 (79 S. E. 246); 19 Ga. App. 295 (91 S. E. 489). The question now raised is upon exceptions to the judgment overruling the plaintiff’s motion for a new trial, which motion was based on the general grounds only. The verdict was not without evidence to support it, and, the learned trial judge having approved the verdict, it was not error to overrule the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Wade, C. J., and Jenkins, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wolverine Soap Co. v. Sellers
79 S.E. 246 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1913)
Sellers v. Wolverine Soap Co.
91 S.E. 489 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1917)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
97 S.E. 890, 23 Ga. App. 232, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 54, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wolverine-soap-co-v-sellers-gactapp-1919.