Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Sellers v. Wolverine Soap Co.

Sellers v. Wolverine Soap Co.

91 S.E. 489, 19 Ga. App. 295, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 101
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedFebruary 16, 1917
Docket7329
StatusPublished
Cited by14 cases

This text of 91 S.E. 489 (Sellers v. Wolverine Soap Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sellers v. Wolverine Soap Co., 91 S.E. 489, 19 Ga. App. 295, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 101 (Ga. Ct. App. 1917).

Opinion

Wade, C. .J.

1. It does not appear in this ease that the evidence introduced, with all reasonable deductions or inferences therefrom, demanded a particular verdict. The court therefore erred in directing the verdict returned. See Wolverine Soap Co. v. Sellers, 13 Ga. App. 380 (79 S. E. 246).

2. There is no provision of law requiring the record of a written instrument guaranteeing the performance of a contract for the services of a salesman. Such a paper is not a mortgage or a conditional bill of sale or an instrument of like character; nor does it describe any property with sufficient certainty to constitute constructive notice, when recorded, as to the articles or goods sold or to be sold to the salesman, The execution of the instrument being admitted, the court did not err in receiving it in evidence.

3. The issues involved should have been submitted to a jury, and for that reason alone the judgment of the lower court is

Reversed.

George and Luke, JJ., concur. Action on guaranty; from city court of "Cairo—Judge Willie. January 18, 1916. J. M. Betters, 8. P. Gain, W. V. Custer, for plaintiffs in error. B. G. Bell, J. 8. Weathers, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Banks v. Payne
445 S.E.2d 826 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1994)
Morris v. Pulliam
309 S.E.2d 423 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1983)
Carr v. Jacuzzi Bros., Inc.
210 S.E.2d 16 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1974)
Benson v. Action Electric Co.
206 S.E.2d 647 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1974)
Andrews v. Commercial Credit Corp.
199 S.E.2d 383 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1973)
Georgia Power Company v. Owens
186 S.E.2d 294 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1971)
W. J. Bremer, Inc. v. United Bonding Insurance
176 S.E.2d 633 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1970)
McCarty v. National Life & Accident Insurance
129 S.E.2d 408 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1962)
Wolverine Soap Co. v. Sellers
97 S.E. 890 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1919)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
91 S.E. 489, 19 Ga. App. 295, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 101, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sellers-v-wolverine-soap-co-gactapp-1917.