Wollman v. Levy

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Wollman v. Levy

489 So. 2d 1239, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1359, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 8386

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJune 17, 1986

DocketNo. 85-2187

StatusPublished

Cited by6 cases

This text of 489 So. 2d 1239 (Wollman v. Levy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wollman v. Levy, 489 So. 2d 1239, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1359, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 8386 (Fla. Ct. App. 1986).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the final summary judgment of foreclosure, see David v. Sun Federal Savings & Loan Association, 461 So.2d 93 (Fla.1984), but vacate the foreclosure sale of the property. Once a timely motion for rehearing is made, the operation of the judgment is suspended until the motion is disposed of. United American Ins. Co. v. Oak, 123 Fla. 159, 170, 166 So. 547, 551 (1936); see Dade County v. Snyder, 134 Fla. 756, 184 So. 489 (1938); Pruitt v. Brock, 437 So.2d 768, 772 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983). Appellants timely moved for a rehearing; therefore, the sale of the property should not have been carried out until the motion had been acted upon.

Affirmed in part, vacated in part, and remanded for further proceedings.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the final summary judgment of foreclosure, see David v. Sun Federal Savings & Loan Association, 461 So.2d 93 (Fla.1984), but vacate the foreclosure sale of the property. Once a timely motion for rehearing is made, the operation of the judgment is suspended until the motion is disposed of. United American Ins. Co. v. Oak, 123 Fla. 159, 170, 166 So. 547, 551 (1936); see Dade County v. Snyder, 134 Fla. 756, 184 So. 489 (1938); Pruitt v. Brock, 437 So.2d 768, 772 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983). Appellants timely moved for a rehearing; therefore, the sale of the property should not have been carried out until the motion had been acted upon.

Affirmed in part, vacated in part, and remanded for further proceedings.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

489 So. 2d 1239, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1359, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 8386, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wollman-v-levy-fladistctapp-1986.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack