Wollman v. Levy

489 So. 2d 1239, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1359, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 8386
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 17, 1986·No. No. 85-2187·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the final summary judgment of foreclosure, see David v. Sun Federal Savings & Loan Association, 461 So.2d 93 (Fla.1984), but vacate the foreclosure sale of the property. Once a timely motion for rehearing is made, the operation of the judgment is suspended until the motion is disposed of. United American Ins. Co. v. Oak, 123 Fla. 159, 170, 166 So. 547, 551 (1936); see Dade County v. Snyder, 134 Fla. 756, 184 So. 489 (1938); Pruitt v. Brock, 437 So.2d 768, 772 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983). Appellants timely moved for a rehearing; therefore, the sale of the property should not have been carried out until the motion had been acted upon.

Affirmed in part, vacated in part, and remanded for further proceedings.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wollman v. Levy, 489 So. 2d 1239, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1359, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 8386 (Fla. Ct. App. 1986).

489 So. 2d 1239 (Wollman v. Levy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Prieto v. Federal National Mortgage Association
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2016
Prieto v. Federal National Mortgage Ass'n
201 So. 3d 659 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2016)
Hoffman v. BankUnited, N.A.
137 So. 3d 1039 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2014)
United Investments Ltd. Partnership v. Resolution Trust Corp.
566 So. 2d 370 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)
Groveland, Inc. v. O'Malley
545 So. 2d 515 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)
Marsh & McLennan, Inc. v. Aerolineas Nacionales Del Ecuador
530 So. 2d 971 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)