Hoffman v. BankUnited, N.A.

137 So. 3d 1039, 2014 WL 627020, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 2242
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 19, 2014·No. No. 2D12-6255·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

SILBERMAN, Judge.

Arthur P. Hoffman appeals the final judgment of foreclosure entered in favor of BankUnited, FSB, and raises four issues. As to the three issues regarding the sufficiency of the evidence to support the final judgment, we conclude that Hoffman is not entitled to relief and affirm without discussion. On the fourth issue, we agree that the foreclosure sale of the property must be set aside because the sale was conducted while Hoffman’s timely motion for rehearing was pending. See Wollman v. Levy, 489 So.2d 1239, 1239 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986). Accordingly, we vacate the foreclosure sale. Because the trial court disposed of the rehearing motion some time after the sale, the court may again order the foreclosure sale of the property on remand.

Affirmed in part, vacated in part, and remanded with directions.

DAVIS, C.J., and SLEET, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hoffman v. BankUnited, N.A., 137 So. 3d 1039, 2014 WL 627020, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 2242 (Fla. Ct. App. 2014).

137 So. 3d 1039 (Hoffman v. BankUnited, N.A.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

JEFFREY LOWENSTEIN AND VICTORIA LOWENSTEIN v. U. S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
253 So. 3d 86 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2018)
JACOB FRANCOIS v. LIBRARY SQUARE ASSOCIATION, INC.
250 So. 3d 728 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2018)
Diaz v. U.S. Bank
239 So. 3d 151 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2018)
944 CWELT-2007 LLC v. Bank of America, N.A.
194 So. 3d 470 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2016)
Prieto v. Federal National Mortgage Association
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2016
Prieto v. Federal National Mortgage Ass'n
201 So. 3d 659 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2016)