Woll v. Village of Rockville Centre

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Woll v. Village of Rockville Centre

205 A.D.2d 683, 613 N.Y.S.2d 640, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6473

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 20, 1994

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 205 A.D.2d 683 (Woll v. Village of Rockville Centre) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Woll v. Village of Rockville Centre, 205 A.D.2d 683, 613 N.Y.S.2d 640, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6473 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant Village of Rock-ville Centre appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Levitt, J.), dated November 18, 1992, which denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, and the complaint is dismissed.

The plaintiff slipped on a patch of ice which remained in a parking lot of the defendant Village of Rockville Centre after the Village had plowed the lot following a snowfall. It is uncontested that no written notice of the icy condition was ever received by the Village. As we have held on previous occasions, the failure to remove all snow or ice from a public roadway or parking lot does not constitute evidence establishing affirmative negligence by the defendant municipality nor does it establish that the municipality caused a condition dangerous to pedestrians (see, Albanese v Town of Hempstead, 176 AD2d 697; Ritacco v Town/Vil. of Harrison, 105 AD2d 834; see also, Conroy v County of Cattaraugus, 176 AD2d 1228). Therefore, summary judgment should have been granted to the defendant. Thompson, J. P., Rosenblatt, Ritter, Friedmann and Krausman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant Village of Rock-ville Centre appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Levitt, J.), dated November 18, 1992, which denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, and the complaint is dismissed.

The plaintiff slipped on a patch of ice which remained in a parking lot of the defendant Village of Rockville Centre after the Village had plowed the lot following a snowfall. It is uncontested that no written notice of the icy condition was ever received by the Village. As we have held on previous occasions, the failure to remove all snow or ice from a public roadway or parking lot does not constitute evidence establishing affirmative negligence by the defendant municipality nor does it establish that the municipality caused a condition dangerous to pedestrians (see, Albanese v Town of Hempstead, 176 AD2d 697; Ritacco v Town/Vil. of Harrison, 105 AD2d 834; see also, Conroy v County of Cattaraugus, 176 AD2d 1228). Therefore, summary judgment should have been granted to the defendant. Thompson, J. P., Rosenblatt, Ritter, Friedmann and Krausman, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

205 A.D.2d 683, 613 N.Y.S.2d 640, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6473, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/woll-v-village-of-rockville-centre-nyappdiv-1994.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack