Conroy v. County of Cattaraugus
This text of 176 A.D.2d 1228 (Conroy v. County of Cattaraugus) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
— Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs, motion granted and complaint dismissed. Memorandum: Plaintiffs, who were injured when their car collided with a school bus at an intersection in the Town of Allegany, commenced this action against the County of Cattaraugus. The court erred in denying the County’s motion for summary judgment. It is undisputed that plaintiffs gave no prior written notice of a highway defect [1229]*1229involving ice or snow, as required by Local Laws, 1982, No. 3 of the County of Cattaraugus (see, Highway Law § 139). Nor can it be said that the County’s failure to sand Route 61 was an act of affirmative negligence, to excuse noncompliance with the notice requirement (see, Piscione v County of Oneida, 159 AD2d 982; Powell v Gates-Chili Cent. School Dist., 50 AD2d 1079, 1079-1080; cf., Siddon v Fishman Co., 65 AD2d 832, lv denied 46 NY2d 714). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Cattaraugus County, Feeman, Jr., J. — Summary Judgment.) Present — Doerr, J. P., Boomer, Pine, Balio and Lawton, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
176 A.D.2d 1228, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/conroy-v-county-of-cattaraugus-nyappdiv-1991.