Wolinetz v. William Treib, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Wolinetz v. William Treib, Inc.

269 A.D. 679, 53 N.Y.S.2d 499, 1945 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3220

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 26, 1945

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 269 A.D. 679 (Wolinetz v. William Treib, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wolinetz v. William Treib, Inc., 269 A.D. 679, 53 N.Y.S.2d 499, 1945 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3220 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1945).

Pincite

Opinion

Action to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by plaintiff, a plumber working in a six-story building under construction, when a wooden form erected in connection with the laying of a concrete floor gave way when he stepped upon it, precipitating him from the third to the second floor. Defendant William Treib, Inc., was the general contractor; defendant Gigliano was the subcontractor doing the concrete work. Defendant William Treib, Inc., appeals from so much of the judgment as is in favor of the plaintiff against it, and dismisses its cross complaint against defendant Gigliano. Plaintiff appeals from that part of the judgment against him and in favor of defendant Gigliano. Judgment insofar as appealed from unanimously affirmed, with costs to plaintiff and to defendant Gigliano, payable by defendant William Treib, Inc. The evidence clearly established a violation of subdivision 4 of section 241 of the Laboi Law by the general contractor. (Employers’ Liability A. Corp. v. Post & McCord, 286 N. Y. 254; Sadrakula v. Stewart & Co., 254 App. Div. 892, affd. 280 N. Y. 651, affd. 309 U. S. 94; Caminiti v. Matthews Construction Co., 241 App. Div. 879.) While the question of the general contractor’s common-law negligence should not have been left to the. jury in the absence of any proof that the wooden form was improperly constructed or that there was any notice of the alleged defective condition, the error was harmless and, in the light of the circumstances, should be disregarded pursuant to section 106 of the Civil Practice Act. (Drucker v. 693 Saratoga Ave. Corp., 245 App. Div. 760.) The fact that the jury exonerated the defendant Gigliano, whose liability had been predicated solely upon an alleged improper construction of the wooden form and failure to provide safeguards therefor, demonstrates that the verdict against the defendant William Treib, Inc., was based upon a violation of the Labor Law. Present — Close, P. J., Hagarty, Johnston, Adel and Lewis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Action to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by plaintiff, a plumber working in a six-story building under construction, when a wooden form erected in connection with the laying of a concrete floor gave way when he stepped upon it, precipitating him from the third to the second floor. Defendant William Treib, Inc., was the general contractor; defendant Gigliano was the subcontractor doing the concrete work. Defendant William Treib, Inc., appeals from so much of the judgment as is in favor of the plaintiff against it, and dismisses its cross complaint against defendant Gigliano. Plaintiff appeals from that part of the judgment against him and in favor of defendant Gigliano. Judgment insofar as appealed from unanimously affirmed, with costs to plaintiff and to defendant Gigliano, payable by defendant William Treib, Inc. The evidence clearly established a violation of subdivision 4 of section 241 of the Laboi Law by the general contractor. (Employers’ Liability A. Corp. v. Post & McCord, 286 N. Y. 254; Sadrakula v. Stewart & Co., 254 App. Div. 892, affd. 280 N. Y. 651, affd. 309 U. S. 94; Caminiti v. Matthews Construction Co., 241 App. Div. 879.) While the question of the general contractor’s common-law negligence should not have been left to the. jury in the absence of any proof that the wooden form was improperly constructed or that there was any notice of the alleged defective condition, the error was harmless and, in the light of the circumstances, should be disregarded pursuant to section 106 of the Civil Practice Act. (Drucker v. 693 Saratoga Ave. Corp., 245 App. Div. 760.) The fact that the jury exonerated the defendant Gigliano, whose liability had been predicated solely upon an alleged improper construction of the wooden form and failure to provide safeguards therefor, demonstrates that the verdict against the defendant William Treib, Inc., was based upon a violation of the Labor Law. Present — Close, P. J., Hagarty, Johnston, Adel and Lewis, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

269 A.D. 679, 53 N.Y.S.2d 499, 1945 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3220, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wolinetz-v-william-treib-inc-nyappdiv-1945.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack