Caminiti v. Matthews Construction Co.

241 A.D. 879
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 15, 1934·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Judgment dismissing plaintiff’s complaint reversed on the law and the facts and a new trial granted, costs to appellant to abide the event. We are of opinion that plaintiff established a prima facie ease of negligence against both defendants, the proof showing that the falling object came from above where plaintiff was working and where alone the employees of defendant Lieder Construction Co., Inc., were engaged, and that the spaces on all of the floors above the sixth floor to the tenth, where the iron workers were engaged, were open and unprotected in violation of the Labor Law (§ 241, subd. 4) and section 195 of the Building Code of the city of New York, the duty of seeing that such protection was afforded being upon the general contractor, defendant Matthews Construction Co., Inc. We are of the further opinion that despite the fact that plaintiff appeared to have had some prior accidents of a character similar to the one now complained of, the question of his credibility and the extent of his injury, if any, was one of fact and not of law. Lazansky, P. J., Rapper, Carswell, Scudder and Tompkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Caminiti v. Matthews Construction Co., 241 A.D. 879 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1934).

241 A.D. 879 (Caminiti v. Matthews Construction Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Olsommer v. George W. Walker & Sons, Inc.
4 A.D.2d 424 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1957)
Hard v. Hollywood Turf Club
246 P.2d 716 (California Court of Appeal, 1952)
Wolinetz v. William Treib, Inc.
269 A.D. 679 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1945)