Wolfred v. State Department of Social Services

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Wolfred v. State Department of Social Services

121 A.D.2d 550, 503 N.Y.S.2d 540, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 58530

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 16, 1986

StatusPublished

This text of 121 A.D.2d 550 (Wolfred v. State Department of Social Services) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wolfred v. State Department of Social Services, 121 A.D.2d 550, 503 N.Y.S.2d 540, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 58530 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1986).

Pincite

Opinion

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent New York State Department of Social Services, dated April 10, 1984, which, after a hearing, upheld [551]*551the local agency’s denial of the petitioner’s application for Medical Assistance.

Determination confirmed and proceeding dismissed on the merits, without costs or disbursements.

The record contains substantial evidence to support the determination of the Administrative Law Judge that the petitioner, though given ample notice and opportunity to submit the necessary eligibility information, failed to do so (see, CPLR 7803 [4]; Matter of Purdy v Kreisberg, 47 NY2d 354, 358; Matter of Acosta v Wollett, 55 NY2d 761). Mangano, J. P., Gibbons, Brown and Hooper, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent New York State Department of Social Services, dated April 10, 1984, which, after a hearing, upheld [551]*551the local agency’s denial of the petitioner’s application for Medical Assistance.

Determination confirmed and proceeding dismissed on the merits, without costs or disbursements.

The record contains substantial evidence to support the determination of the Administrative Law Judge that the petitioner, though given ample notice and opportunity to submit the necessary eligibility information, failed to do so (see, CPLR 7803 [4]; Matter of Purdy v Kreisberg, 47 NY2d 354, 358; Matter of Acosta v Wollett, 55 NY2d 761). Mangano, J. P., Gibbons, Brown and Hooper, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

121 A.D.2d 550, 503 N.Y.S.2d 540, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 58530, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wolfred-v-state-department-of-social-services-nyappdiv-1986.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack