Acosta v. Wollett

431 N.E.2d 966, 55 N.Y.2d 761, 447 N.Y.S.2d 241, 1981 N.Y. LEXIS 3293
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedDecember 15, 1981
StatusPublished
Cited by20 cases

This text of 431 N.E.2d 966 (Acosta v. Wollett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Acosta v. Wollett, 431 N.E.2d 966, 55 N.Y.2d 761, 447 N.Y.S.2d 241, 1981 N.Y. LEXIS 3293 (N.Y. 1981).

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The judgment of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

The record contains substantial evidence to support the finding that petitioners engaged in an unjustified “concerted stoppage of work or slowdown” in violation of subdi[763]*763vision 1 of section 210 of the Civil Service Law. This is not to say that the record would not have supported a contrary conclusion; but judicial review of these matters is limited. Where on the whole record the hearing officer’s determination is supported by substantial evidence our review is at an end.

Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer concur.

Judgment affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of Castillo v. Shea
2024 NY Slip Op 02090 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2024)
Matter of Buffalo Teachers Fedn., Inc. v. New York State Pub. Empl. Relations Bd.
173 N.Y.S.3d 83 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2022)
Zabari v. New York City Department of Environmental Protection
112 A.D.3d 458 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)
Yancey v. New York City Housing Authority
23 Misc. 3d 740 (New York Supreme Court, 2009)
Café La China Corp. v. New York State Liquor Authority
43 A.D.3d 280 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
Shuman v. New York State Racing & Wagering Board
40 A.D.3d 385 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
Verdell v. Lincoln Amsterdam House, Inc.
27 A.D.3d 388 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
Vallebuona v. Kerik
294 A.D.2d 44 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)
Romero v. Martinez
280 A.D.2d 58 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
Blanco v. Popolizio
190 A.D.2d 554 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)
Soto v. Koehler
171 A.D.2d 567 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)
Cruz v. Scully
716 F. Supp. 766 (S.D. New York, 1989)
Wolfred v. State Department of Social Services
121 A.D.2d 550 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1986)
Engel v. Calgon Corp.
114 A.D.2d 108 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1986)
Heller v. New York State Tax Commission
116 A.D.2d 901 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1986)
Hudson View Gardens, Inc. v. State Tax Commission
115 A.D.2d 121 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)
Gardner v. Axelrod
104 A.D.2d 633 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
431 N.E.2d 966, 55 N.Y.2d 761, 447 N.Y.S.2d 241, 1981 N.Y. LEXIS 3293, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/acosta-v-wollett-ny-1981.