Acosta v. Wollett
This text of 431 N.E.2d 966 (Acosta v. Wollett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The judgment of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.
The record contains substantial evidence to support the finding that petitioners engaged in an unjustified “concerted stoppage of work or slowdown” in violation of subdi[763]*763vision 1 of section 210 of the Civil Service Law. This is not to say that the record would not have supported a contrary conclusion; but judicial review of these matters is limited. Where on the whole record the hearing officer’s determination is supported by substantial evidence our review is at an end.
Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer concur.
Judgment affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
431 N.E.2d 966, 55 N.Y.2d 761, 447 N.Y.S.2d 241, 1981 N.Y. LEXIS 3293, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/acosta-v-wollett-ny-1981.