Wolfgang Hirczy v. Citibank, N.A.

• Court: Court of Appeals of Texas
• Decided: March 11, 2014
• Docket: 01-13-00986-CV
• Status: Published

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION

Cause number: 01-13-00986-CV Style: Wolfgang Hirczy v. Citibank. N.A.

Date motions filed: February 6, 2014 Type of motions: Appellee’s Second Motion to Extend Time to File Appellee’s Brief and Motion to Assess Costs to Supplement Record to Appellant Party filing motion: Appellee Documents to be filed: Appellee’s Brief

If motion to extend time: Original due date: January 22, 2014 Number of previous extensions granted: 1 Current Due date: February 21, 2014 Date Requested: 30 days from date supplemental clerk’s record is filed

Ordered that motion is:

 Granted If document is to be filed, document due:  Absent extraordinary circumstances, the Court will not grant additional motions to extend time  Denied  Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot)  Other: _____________________________________ Appellee filed its Appellee’s Brief on February 21, 2014. Accordingly, appellee’s second motion to extend time to file its brief is dismissed as moot. A supplemental clerk’s record was filed with this Court on March 4, 2014. Costs will be assessed as appropriate under Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure 34.5(b) and 43.4. Accordingly, appellee’s motion to assess costs to supplement the clerk’s record to appellant is dismissed as moot.

Judge's signature: /s/ Justice Jim Sharp 

Panel consists of ____________________________________________

Date: March 11, 2014

November 7, 2008 Revision