Wolfe v. Smith

97 A. 853, 252 Pa. 562, 1916 Pa. LEXIS 659
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided March 6, 1916·No. Appeal, No. 1·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The negligence of the defendant and the contributory negligence of the plaintiff were questions of fact for the jury. No reversible error appears in the court’s' rulings on offers of evidence or in the instructions to the jury, and the judgment is, therefore, affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wolfe v. Smith, 97 A. 853, 252 Pa. 562, 1916 Pa. LEXIS 659 (Pa. 1916).

97 A. 853 (Wolfe v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Fischer v. City of Philadelphia
82 Pa. D. & C. 263 (Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas, 1952)
McAllister v. Pennsylvania Railroad
187 A. 415 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1936)