Wolfe v. Geno

332 N.W.2d 457, 122 Mich. App. 250
Michigan Court of Appeals·Decided December 21, 1982·No. 59696·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

122 Mich. App. 250 (1982)
332 N.W.2d 457

WOLFE
v.
GENO

Docket No. 59696.

Michigan Court of Appeals.

Decided December 21, 1982.

Roy DeGesero, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for plaintiff.

*251 Before: BEASLEY, P.J., and M.J. KELLY and W.S. WHITE,[*] JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff brought this paternity action against defendant on March 3, 1981, on behalf of her child, who was born on February 2, 1973. Defendant denied paternity and moved for accelerated judgment, raising the six-year statute of limitations, MCL 722.714(b); MSA 25.494(b). Following a hearing, the trial court granted defendant's motion and dismissed plaintiff's action. Plaintiff appeals as of right.

We reject plaintiff's argument that the limitation period of the paternity act, six years, violates the Equal Protection Clause of the state and federal constitutions. Shifter v Wolf, 120 Mich App 182; 327 NW2d 429 (1982).

Further, under the clear language of the statute, an acknowledgment of paternity by a defendant must be "in writing" in order to toll the running of the limitation period. MCL 722.714(b); MSA 25.494(b).

Affirmed.

NOTES

[*] Circuit judge, sitting on the Court of Appeals by assignment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wolfe v. Geno, 332 N.W.2d 457, 122 Mich. App. 250 (Mich. Ct. App. 1982).

332 N.W.2d 457 (Wolfe v. Geno) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wolfe v. Geno
351 N.W.2d 316 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 1984)
Frazier v. Castellani
342 N.W.2d 623 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 1983)