Wolfe v. Baltimore & Philadelphia Steamboat Co.

Superior Court of Delaware

Wolfe v. Baltimore & Philadelphia Steamboat Co.

99 A. 304, 29 Del. 352, 6 Boyce 352, 1916 Del. LEXIS 41

CourtSuperior Court of Delaware

DecidedJune 7, 1916

DocketNo. 63

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 99 A. 304 (Wolfe v. Baltimore & Philadelphia Steamboat Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wolfe v. Baltimore & Philadelphia Steamboat Co., 99 A. 304, 29 Del. 352, 6 Boyce 352, 1916 Del. LEXIS 41 (Del. Ct. App. 1916).

Pincite

Opinion

Heisel, J.,

delivering the opinion of the court:

This is an action for personal injuries; the allegations of the narr. being that the tort was committed on the Chesapeake Bay [353]*353within the State of Maryland, and nowhere lays the venue in this county.

The defendant demurred to the declaration, and alleged as grounds of demurrer the failure to lay the venue in this county.

In actions of this character, in a court of general jurisdiction, the place is not material or traversable (1 Chit, on Pleading, 260, 268, 394; 1 Woolley on Del. Prac., § 349), and therefore within, the provisions of Section 4178 of the Code, which is as follows:

“It shall not be deemed necessary, in any declaration, or other pleading, to lay the venue in the county in which the action is brought, nor to set forth in any maimer the place in which an-act is alleged to have been done, unless when, from the nature of the case, the place may be material, or traversable.”

The demurrer is overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI