Home/Superior Court of Delaware/Purnell v. Pennsylvania Railroad Co.

Purnell v. Pennsylvania Railroad Co.

112 A. 527, 31 Del. 173, 1 W.W. Harr. 173, 1921 Del. LEXIS 6
CourtSuperior Court of Delaware
DecidedFebruary 8, 1921
DocketCase, No. 18
StatusPublished

This text of 112 A. 527 (Purnell v. Pennsylvania Railroad Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Purnell v. Pennsylvania Railroad Co., 112 A. 527, 31 Del. 173, 1 W.W. Harr. 173, 1921 Del. LEXIS 6 (Del. Ct. App. 1921).

Opinion

Boyce, J.

The name of the county is set forth in the caption attached to the declaration, and thereafter laying the venue in each count, as “in the county aforesaid,” meets any objection [175]*175made against the sufficiency of the declaration. Frick, Adm’r, v. Miller, 7 Boyce, 366,107 Atl. 391; Com. v. Edwards, 4 Gray (Mass.) 1. See also, Wolfe v. B. & P. S. Co., 6 Boyce, 352, 99 Atl. 304.

The demurrer is overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wolfe v. Baltimore & Philadelphia Steamboat Co.
99 A. 304 (Superior Court of Delaware, 1916)
Frick v. Miller
107 A. 391 (Superior Court of Delaware, 1918)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
112 A. 527, 31 Del. 173, 1 W.W. Harr. 173, 1921 Del. LEXIS 6, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/purnell-v-pennsylvania-railroad-co-delsuperct-1921.