Purnell v. Pennsylvania Railroad Co.
112 A. 527, 31 Del. 173, 1 W.W. Harr. 173, 1921 Del. LEXIS 6
Opinion
The name of the county is set forth in the caption attached to the declaration, and thereafter laying the venue in each count, as “in the county aforesaid,” meets any objection [175]*175made against the sufficiency of the declaration. Frick, Adm’r, v. Miller, 7 Boyce, 366,107 Atl. 391; Com. v. Edwards, 4 Gray (Mass.) 1. See also, Wolfe v. B. & P. S. Co., 6 Boyce, 352, 99 Atl. 304.
The demurrer is overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Purnell v. Pennsylvania Railroad Co., 112 A. 527, 31 Del. 173, 1 W.W. Harr. 173, 1921 Del. LEXIS 6 (Del. Ct. App. 1921).
112 A. 527 (Purnell v. Pennsylvania Railroad Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Wolfe v. Baltimore & Philadelphia Steamboat Co.
99 A. 304 (Superior Court of Delaware, 1916)
Frick v. Miller
107 A. 391 (Superior Court of Delaware, 1918)