Wolf v. Usher

28 U.S. 269, 7 L. Ed. 675, 3 Pet. 269, 1830 U.S. LEXIS 538
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided February 25, 1830·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

28 U.S. 269 (____)
3 Pet. 269

JAMES D. WOLF
vs.
GEORGE F. USHER.

Supreme Court of United States.

Mr Coxe, for plaintiff; Mr Whipple, for defendant.

When the case was opened by the counsel for the plaintiff, it was found on inspecting the record, that the particular point on which the judges of the circuit court had differed, was not certified. The whole record had been sent up, and it contained a certificate that the judges of the court had differed in opinion, without a specific statement of what the difference was.

The court refused to take jurisdiction of the cause, and remanded the same to the circuit court of Rhode Island, with directions to proceed therein according to law.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wolf v. Usher, 28 U.S. 269, 7 L. Ed. 675, 3 Pet. 269, 1830 U.S. LEXIS 538 (1830).

28 U.S. 269 (Wolf v. Usher) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Waddell
112 U.S. 76 (Supreme Court, 1884)
Bagg v. City of Detroit
5 Mich. 66 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1858)