W.M.S. Builders, Inc. v. Newburgh Steel Products, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

W.M.S. Builders, Inc. v. Newburgh Steel Products, Inc.

289 A.D.2d 567, 735 N.Y.S.2d 802, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13034

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 31, 2001·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for breach of contract, the defendant appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (McCarty, J.), entered August 16, 2000, which, upon a jury verdict, is in favor of the plaintiff and against it in the principal sum of $131,725.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

Contrary to the defendant’s contentions, the plaintiffs proof of damages was legally sufficient to support the jury verdict against it (see, Cohen v Hallmark Cards, 45 NY2d 493, 499). “Proof of damages may be based solely on oral testimony as long as the witness has knowledge of the actual costs” (Electronic Servs. Intl. v Silvers, 284 AD2d 367, 368; see, D’Angelo v State of New York, 39 NY2d 781, 782-783). Here, the plaintiffs witness, who was a supervisor at the job site until the plaintiff was terminated, had knowledge of the actual costs (see, D’Angelo v State of New York, supra). The plaintiffs failure to offer into evidence any payroll records goes only to the credibility of its witness.

Furthermore, the Supreme Court properly concluded that the defendant waived the defense of improper service by failing [568] to move to dismiss on that ground within 60 days of January 1, 1997, the effective date of the 1996 amendment to CPLR 3211 (e) (see, Alaska Seaboard Partners v Anninos, 259 AD2d 572, 573). Consequently, we do not reach the issue of whether service was properly effected.

The defendant’s remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Luciano, J. P., Townes, Crane and Prudenti, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for breach of contract, the defendant appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (McCarty, J.), entered August 16, 2000, which, upon a jury verdict, is in favor of the plaintiff and against it in the principal sum of $131,725.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

Contrary to the defendant’s contentions, the plaintiffs proof of damages was legally sufficient to support the jury verdict against it (see, Cohen v Hallmark Cards, 45 NY2d 493, 499). “Proof of damages may be based solely on oral testimony as long as the witness has knowledge of the actual costs” (Electronic Servs. Intl. v Silvers, 284 AD2d 367, 368; see, D’Angelo v State of New York, 39 NY2d 781, 782-783). Here, the plaintiffs witness, who was a supervisor at the job site until the plaintiff was terminated, had knowledge of the actual costs (see, D’Angelo v State of New York, supra). The plaintiffs failure to offer into evidence any payroll records goes only to the credibility of its witness.

Furthermore, the Supreme Court properly concluded that the defendant waived the defense of improper service by failing [568] to move to dismiss on that ground within 60 days of January 1, 1997, the effective date of the 1996 amendment to CPLR 3211 (e) (see, Alaska Seaboard Partners v Anninos, 259 AD2d 572, 573). Consequently, we do not reach the issue of whether service was properly effected.

The defendant’s remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Luciano, J. P., Townes, Crane and Prudenti, JJ., concur.

W.M.S. Builders, Inc. v. Newburgh Steel Products, Inc., 289 A.D.2d 567, 735 N.Y.S.2d 802, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13034 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

289 A.D.2d 567 (W.M.S. Builders, Inc. v. Newburgh Steel Products, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related