Wm. A. Hausman Co. v. United States
45 Cust. Ct. 246
United States Customs Court·Decided August 30, 1960·No. No. 64475; protest 58/10083 (Seattle)·Published
Opinion
Opinion by
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of prepared or preserved pork similar in all material [247]*247respects to that the subject of C. J. Tower & Sons v. United States (43 Cust. Ct. 36, C.D. 2100), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Wm. A. Hausman Co. v. United States, 45 Cust. Ct. 246 (cusc 1960).
45 Cust. Ct. 246 (Wm. A. Hausman Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Tower v. United States
43 Cust. Ct. 36 (U.S. Customs Court, 1959)