Wixen Music UK Ltd. v. Transparence Entertainment Group, Inc.

District Court, C.D. California·Decided August 25, 2022·No. 2:21-cv-02663·Unknown

Opinion

Case 2:21-cv-02663-MEMF-MRW Document 35 Filed 08/25/22 Page 1 of 20 Page ID #:323

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 WIXEN MUSIC UK LTD., a UK limited corporation, Case No. 2:21-cv-02663 ODW 11 (MRWx) Plaintiff, 12 v. STIPULATED PROTECTIVE TRANSPARENCE 14 ENTERTAINMENT GROUP INC., a (MRW VERSION 4/19) California corporation; DENNIS 15 DREITH, an individual; SHARI HOFFMAN, an individual; and ☐ Check if submitted without 16 TANIA OLIVEIRA, NÉE material modifications to MRW form WOODCOCK, an individual; and 17 Does 1 through 10, inclusive, 18 Defendants. 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER Case 2:21-cv-02663-MEMF-MRW Document 35 Filed 08/25/22 Page 2 of 20 Page ID #:324

1 1. INTRODUCTION 2 1.1 PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS 3 Disclosure and discovery activity in this action is likely to involve production 4 of confidential, proprietary, or private information for which special protection from 5 public disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation 6 may be warranted. Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate to and petition the Court 7 to enter the following Stipulated Protective Order. The parties acknowledge that this 8 Order does not confer blanket protections on all disclosures or responses to discovery 9 and that the protection it affords from public disclosure and use extends only to the 10 limited information or items that are entitled to confidential treatment under the 11 applicable legal principles. The parties further acknowledge, as set forth in Section 12 12.3, below, that this Stipulated Protective Order does not entitle them to file 13 confidential information under seal; Civil Local Rule 79-5 sets forth the procedures 14 that must be followed and the standards that will be applied in this non-sealed civil 15 case when a party or non-party seeks permission from the court to file material under 16 seal. 17 1.2 GOOD CAUSE STATEMENT 18 (a) “CONFIDENTIAL” Designations: The parties anticipate that 19 discovery in this matter may involve disclosure of personal phone numbers, personal 20 email addresses, other personal identifying information that would cause harm if 21 made part of the public record, and information otherwise generally unavailable to the 22 public, or which may be privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure under state 23 or federal statutes, court rules, case decisions, or common law. In order to protect 24 from the irreparable harm resulting from the disclosure of such material, these types 25 of personal information may be properly designated confidential. 26 (b) “CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” 27 Designations: The parties anticipate there may be documents that are of an extremely 28 2 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER Case 2:21-cv-02663-MEMF-MRW Document 35 Filed 08/25/22 Page 3 of 20 Page ID #:325

1 sensitive nature that would cause substantial and concrete competitive injury if 2 disclosed to an opposing party in this litigation and that such injury could not be 3 avoided by less restrictive means. The types of documents that might warrant a 4 “CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” Designation, assuming they 5 otherwise meet the above criteria, may include, but are not limited to, customer and 6 pricing lists, other customer information, and other valuable research, development, 7 commercial, financial, technical and/or proprietary information for which special 8 protection from public disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecution 9 of this action is warranted. Such confidential and proprietary materials and 10 information consist of, among other things, confidential business or financial 11 information, information regarding confidential business practices, or other 12 confidential research, development, or commercial information (including 13 information implicating privacy rights of third parties). 14 (c) Intent of the Parties: A protective order is justified in this matter 15 for the following reasons: to expedite the flow of information, to facilitate the prompt 16 resolution of disputes over confidentiality of discovery materials, to adequately 17 protect information the parties are entitled to keep confidential, to ensure that the 18 parties are permitted reasonable use of such material in preparation for trial, to address 19 the handling of such materials at the end of this litigation, and to serve the ends of 20 justice. It is the intent of the parties that information will not be designated as 21 “CONFIDENTIAL” or “CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” for 22 purely tactical reasons. The parties also intend that no materials will be designated 23 “CONFIDENTIAL” or “CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” without 24 a good faith belief that such material has been maintained in a confidential, non-public 25 manner, and that there is good cause why it should not be part of the public record of 26 this case. 27 /// 28 3 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER Case 2:21-cv-02663-MEMF-MRW Document 35 Filed 08/25/22 Page 4 of 20 Page ID #:326

1 2. DEFINITIONS 2 2.1 Action: Wixen Music UK Ltd. v. Transparence Entertainment Group 3 Inc., et al., Case No. 2:21-cv-02663 ODW (MRWx), pending in the United States 4 District Court for the Central District of California. 5 2.2 Challenging Party: a Party or Non-Party that challenges the designation 6 of information or items under this Order. 7 2.3 8 (a) “CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items: information 9 (regardless of how it is generated, stored or maintained) or tangible things that qualify 10 for protection under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c), and as specified above in 11 the Good Cause Statement. 12 (b) “CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” Information 13 or Items: information that qualifies as “CONFIDENTIAL” information 14 under 2.3(a) above, that also constitutes information that is extremely confidential 15 and/or sensitive in nature, the disclosure of which to another Party or Non-Party 16 would create a substantial risk of serious harm and/or irreparable injury that could 17 not be avoided by less restrictive means. 18 2.4 Counsel: Outside Counsel of Record and House Counsel (as well as their 19 support staff). 20 2.5 Designating Party: a Party or Non-Party that designates information or 21 items that it produces in disclosures or in responses to discovery as 22 “CONFIDENTIAL” or “CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY.” 23 2.6 Disclosure or Discovery Material: all items or information, regardless 24 of the medium or manner in which it is generated, stored, or maintained (including, 25 among other things, testimony, transcripts, and tangible things), that are produced or 26 generated in disclosures or responses to discovery in this matter. 27 /// 28 4 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER Case 2:21-cv-02663-MEMF-MRW Document 35 Filed 08/25/22 Page 5 of 20 Page ID #:327

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wixen Music UK Ltd. v. Transparence Entertainment Group, Inc., (C.D. Cal. 2022).

Wixen Music UK Ltd. v. Transparence Entertainment Group, Inc. (Wixen Music UK Ltd. v. Transparence Entertainment Group, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.