Witter v. Phelps
This text of 163 Cal. 814 (Witter v. Phelps) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal by plaintiff from a judgment dismissing the action.
The facts are, in all material respects, like those in Witter v. Phelps, ante, p. 655, [126 Pac. 593], just decided, except that this action was commenced at an earlier date, and the delay in service was some months longer than in the case referred to. For the reasons stated in S. F. No. 5878, the judgment is affirmed.
Hearing in Bank denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
163 Cal. 814, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/witter-v-phelps-cal-1912.