Witherspoon v. State
599 So. 2d 743, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 6419, 1992 WL 115687
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Witherspoon v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 634 So. 2d 208 →
Opinion
Defendant appeals from judgments of conviction for first degree murder and attempted first degree murder. We agree that the trial court erred in permitting the State to call Mr. Cox as a witness knowing that he would invoke his Fifth Amendment privilege and refuse to testify. Hankerson v. State, 347 So.2d 744 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977). However, under the circumstances of this case, the error was harmless. Shere v. State, 579 So.2d 86 (Fla.1991); State v. DiGuilio, 491 So.2d 1129 (Fla.1986).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Witherspoon v. State, 599 So. 2d 743, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 6419, 1992 WL 115687 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).
599 So. 2d 743 (Witherspoon v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hankerson v. State
347 So. 2d 744 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1977)
State v. DiGuilio
491 So. 2d 1129 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1986)
Shere v. State
579 So. 2d 86 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1991)