Witherspoon v. State

597 So. 2d 986, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 6127, 1992 WL 109958
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 27, 1992·No. No. 91-0067·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

As the state concedes, the sole point meriting discussion concerns the trial court’s incorrect designation of the crimes the defendant committed. The trial court classified the crime of shooting into an occupied vehicle as a first degree felony, when in fact it is a second degree felony. Section 790.19, Fla.Stat. (1991). It also misclassified the crime of aggravated assault as a second degree felony instead of a third degree felony. Section 784.021(2), Fla.Stat. (1991). We remand this judgment for correction of the foregoing errors contained in it.

AFFIRMED IN PART; REMANDED IN PART.

[987]*987LETTS and GARRETT, JJ., and WALDEN, JAMES H., Senior Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Witherspoon v. State, 597 So. 2d 986, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 6127, 1992 WL 109958 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

597 So. 2d 986 (Witherspoon v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Witherspoon v. State
634 So. 2d 208 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)