Witham v. United States
This text of Witham v. United States (Witham v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. Tennessee primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
BRIAN SCOTT WITHAM, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) Nos.: 3:20-CV-277-TAV-DCP ) 3:15-CR-177-TAV-DCP-2 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Respondent. )
JUDGMENT ORDER
For the reasons stated in the memorandum opinion filed contemporaneously, petitioner is not entitled to relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255, so his motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence [No. 3:20-CV-277 Doc. 1] is DENIED. Therefore, this action is DISMISSED, and the Clerk is DIRECTED to close civil case number 3:20-CV-277-TAV-DCP. The Court CERTIFIES that any appeal from this action would not be taken in good faith and would be totally frivolous. Therefore, any application by petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal is DENIED. See Fed. R. App. P. 24. Any appeal from this order will be treated as an application for a certificate of appealability, which is hereby DENIED because petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right and jurists of reason would not dispute the above conclusions. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253; Fed. R. App. P. 22(b); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000). IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/ Thomas A. Varlan UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
ENTERED AS A JUDGMENT
LeAnna R. Wilson CLERK OF COURT
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Witham v. United States, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/witham-v-united-states-tned-2021.