Wise v. Del Toro

122 A.D.2d 714, 505 N.Y.S.2d 880, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 59255
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedAugust 14, 1986
StatusPublished
Cited by19 cases

This text of 122 A.D.2d 714 (Wise v. Del Toro) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wise v. Del Toro, 122 A.D.2d 714, 505 N.Y.S.2d 880, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 59255 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1986).

Opinions

— Order, Family Court, Bronx County (Lynch, J.), entered June 7, 1985, which dismissed petitioner’s petition for visitation with his child, reversed, on the law, without costs, and the matter remanded for hearing.

The petitioner, who is incarcerated in a New York State correctional facility, sought rights to visitation with his seven-year-old daughter. The matter was set for hearing in Family Court on June 7, 1985. The respondent mother was present with counsel. The petitioner was represented by counsel. No Law Guardian had been appointed for the child. Petitioner’s attorney indicated that he had inquired of the correctional institution and had been given a "scheduled visitation” for petitioner and his child. The court then asked respondent the reason for petitioner’s incarceration. Respondent stated, inter alia, "I’m really not sure. I believe it was attempted murder though.”

At that point, the court stated "I don’t think it’s wise for a child to be taken to prison particularly to see an attempted murderer. If that is the only information we have, I’m going to — 'Petition dismissed’. Information supplied indicates petitioner is in jail for attempted murder. It is not in the best interest of the child to be taken to see petitioner in prison setting.”

Petitioner was not given an opportunity to present evidence. His counsel was not afforded an opportunity to cross-examine respondent as to her uncertain statement regarding the reason for petitioner’s incarceration. The child was not seen or spoken to. She was not represented by a Law Guardian.

It is presumed that parental visitation is in the best interest of the child, absent proof that such visitation would be harmful. (Matter of Nathaniel T., 97 AD2d 973 [4th Dept 1983].) There should be a full inquiry before visitation is denied to a parent.

We take judicial notice of the fact that visitation by children to incarcerated parents is frequent in this State and that the Department of Correctional Services makes provision for such visitation. It cannot be said that the fact of a parent’s incarceration, standing alone, makes visitation of that par[715]*715ent’s child inappropriate. Concur — Sullivan, Carro, Rosenberger and Ellerin, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gottlieb v. Gottlieb
137 A.D.3d 614 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)
Cardona v. Vantassel
96 A.D.3d 1052 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)
Matter of J.G. v. B.G.
2005 NY Slip Op 51413(U) (Nassau Family Court, 2005)
Nelson M. v. Rebecca P.
187 Misc. 2d 921 (NYC Family Court, 2001)
Selca v. Selca
267 A.D.2d 314 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)
Ciulla v. McGee
255 A.D.2d 580 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)
Ingersol v. Ingersol
234 A.D.2d 1000 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)
In re Tamara H.
228 A.D.2d 598 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)
Youngblood v. Amrhein
216 A.D.2d 475 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)
Aida G. v. Carlos P.
163 Misc. 2d 423 (NYC Family Court, 1994)
Teixeria v. Teixeria
205 A.D.2d 545 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)
Simpson v. Finnigan
202 A.D.2d 592 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)
Vann v. Vann
187 A.D.2d 821 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)
Mohammed v. Cortland County Department of Social Services
186 A.D.2d 908 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)
Scott C. v. Marietta C.
156 Misc. 2d 336 (NYC Family Court, 1992)
In re Evan
153 Misc. 2d 844 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1992)
Ceasar A. R. v. Raquel D.
179 A.D.2d 574 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
122 A.D.2d 714, 505 N.Y.S.2d 880, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 59255, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wise-v-del-toro-nyappdiv-1986.