Selca v. Selca

267 A.D.2d 314, 699 N.Y.S.2d 891, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12848
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 13, 1999·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

—In a visitation proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, the father appeals from an order of the Family Court, Orange County (Bivona, J.), entered March 16, 1998, which, upon granting the mother’s application made at the close of his case at the fact-finding hearing, dismissed the petition.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

[315] While a parent’s incarceration, standing alone, does not make visitation inappropriate (see, Matter of Wise v Del Toro, 122 AD2d 714), the determination of the Family Court was appropriate here based on all of the circumstances of this case which demonstrate that visitation would be inimical to the welfare of the child (see, Matter of Davis v Davis, 265 AD2d 552). Ritter, J. P., Sullivan, Goldstein and H. Miller, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Selca v. Selca, 267 A.D.2d 314, 699 N.Y.S.2d 891, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12848 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

267 A.D.2d 314 (Selca v. Selca) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wispe v. Leandry
63 A.D.3d 853 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
Morales v. Bruno
29 A.D.3d 1001 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
Marcial v. Sullivan
296 A.D.2d 551 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)
Nelson M. v. Rebecca P.
187 Misc. 2d 921 (NYC Family Court, 2001)
Thomas v. Thomas
277 A.D.2d 935 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)