Selca v. Selca

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Selca v. Selca

267 A.D.2d 314, 699 N.Y.S.2d 891, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12848

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 13, 1999

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 267 A.D.2d 314 (Selca v. Selca) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Selca v. Selca, 267 A.D.2d 314, 699 N.Y.S.2d 891, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12848 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

—In a visitation proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, the father appeals from an order of the Family Court, Orange County (Bivona, J.), entered March 16, 1998, which, upon granting the mother’s application made at the close of his case at the fact-finding hearing, dismissed the petition.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

[315]*315While a parent’s incarceration, standing alone, does not make visitation inappropriate (see, Matter of Wise v Del Toro, 122 AD2d 714), the determination of the Family Court was appropriate here based on all of the circumstances of this case which demonstrate that visitation would be inimical to the welfare of the child (see, Matter of Davis v Davis, 265 AD2d 552). Ritter, J. P., Sullivan, Goldstein and H. Miller, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In a visitation proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, the father appeals from an order of the Family Court, Orange County (Bivona, J.), entered March 16, 1998, which, upon granting the mother’s application made at the close of his case at the fact-finding hearing, dismissed the petition.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

[315]*315While a parent’s incarceration, standing alone, does not make visitation inappropriate (see, Matter of Wise v Del Toro, 122 AD2d 714), the determination of the Family Court was appropriate here based on all of the circumstances of this case which demonstrate that visitation would be inimical to the welfare of the child (see, Matter of Davis v Davis, 265 AD2d 552). Ritter, J. P., Sullivan, Goldstein and H. Miller, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

267 A.D.2d 314, 699 N.Y.S.2d 891, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12848, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/selca-v-selca-nyappdiv-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack