Wisconsin Central Railway Co. v. Schug

145 N.W. 177, 155 Wis. 563, 1914 Wisc. LEXIS 43
CourtWisconsin Supreme Court
DecidedFebruary 3, 1914
StatusPublished
Cited by16 cases

This text of 145 N.W. 177 (Wisconsin Central Railway Co. v. Schug) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Wisconsin Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wisconsin Central Railway Co. v. Schug, 145 N.W. 177, 155 Wis. 563, 1914 Wisc. LEXIS 43 (Wis. 1914).

Opinion

WiNslow, C. J.

In this case it is held:

1. A land contract which does not specifically describe the land to be conveyed, but refers to it. in such terms that by the aid of the facts and circumstances surrounding the parties at the time the court can with reasonable certainty determine the land which is to be conveyed, satisfies the statute of frauds in this regard and may be enforced. Messer v. Oestreich, 52 Wis. 684, 10 N. W. 6; Docter v. Hellberg, 65 Wis. 415, 27 N. W. 176; Inglis v. Fohey, 136 Wis. 28, 116 N. W. 857.

2. A contract to convey land is not breached by reason of the existence of a railroad right of way over it', if the right of way be either in actual use or so prepared for use that its existence and purpose are obvious and unmistakable. Smith v. Hughes, 50 Wis. 620, 7 N. W. 653.

By the Court. — Judgment reversed, and action remanded with directions to enter judgment for specific performance as demanded by the complaint.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Murlas Brothers Commodities, Inc. v. Bushman
280 N.W.2d 769 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1979)
Edlebeck v. Barnes
216 N.W.2d 551 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1974)
Wadsworth v. Moe
193 N.W.2d 645 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1972)
Taxman v. McMahan
124 N.W.2d 68 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1963)
Stuesser v. Ebel
120 N.W.2d 679 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1963)
Kuester v. Rowlands
26 N.W.2d 639 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1947)
White v. Machovec
253 N.W. 389 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1934)
Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland v. Madson
232 N.W. 525 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1930)
Pierson v. Dorff
223 N.W. 579 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1929)
Heller v. Baird
210 N.W. 680 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1926)
Allen v. Denman
278 S.W. 899 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1925)
Wirthwein v. Dailey
196 N.W. 221 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1923)
Gifford v. Straub
179 N.W. 600 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1920)
Sheffield-King Milling Co. v. Jacobs
175 N.W. 796 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1920)
Douglas v. Vorpahl
166 N.W. 833 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1918)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
145 N.W. 177, 155 Wis. 563, 1914 Wisc. LEXIS 43, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wisconsin-central-railway-co-v-schug-wis-1914.