Winters v. Pearson

14 P. 304, 72 Cal. 553, 1887 Cal. LEXIS 572
California Supreme Court·Decided June 17, 1887·No. No. 9646·Published·Cited by 9 cases

Opinion

Thornton, J.

The attachment was improperly and irregularly issued within the ruling of this court in Wilke v. Cohn, 54 Cal. 212.

On a motion to discharge a writ of attachment, on the ground that it was improperly or irregularly issued, the affidavit on which the writ was issued is not amendable. This, in our opinion, is in accordance with section 558 of the Code of Civil Procedure, which provides that if, on such an application, it satisfactorily appears that the writ was improperly or irregularly issued, it must be discharged.

To allow the affidavit to be made good by amendment, and upon such action refuse to discharge the writ, would, in our judgment, violate the requirements of the section just above cited.

The defendant in the action did not waive his right to apply to discharge the writ under section 556 of the Code of Civil Procedure, because he had previously released .the property from the operation of the writ under sections 554 and 555 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The right to make the application under section 556 is expressly given, though the defendant has previously proceeded under sections 554 and 555.

The orders of the court must be affirmed.

Ordered accordingly.

McFarland, J., and Sharpstein, J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Winters v. Pearson, 14 P. 304, 72 Cal. 553, 1887 Cal. LEXIS 572 (Cal. 1887).

14 P. 304 (Winters v. Pearson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ortiz v. Quiñones
41 P.R. 260 (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, 1930)
Patch v. Stewart
253 P. 254 (Montana Supreme Court, 1927)
Heaton v. Panhandle Smelting Co.
179 P. 510 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1919)
Fairbanks, Morse & Co. v. Getchell
110 P. 331 (California Court of Appeal, 1910)
O'Connell v. Walker
108 P. 668 (California Court of Appeal, 1910)
Pajaro Valley Bank v. Scurich
95 P. 911 (California Court of Appeal, 1908)
Tibbet v. Sue
54 P. 741 (California Supreme Court, 1898)
Freer v. White
51 N.W. 807 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1892)