Winternitz v. Schmidt

154 N.W. 626, 161 Wis. 421, 1915 Wisc. LEXIS 229
Wisconsin Supreme Court·Decided October 26, 1915·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Winslow, C. J.

The order of the circuit court must be affirmed. The moving papers in the civil court included an answer setting forth a complete" defense and affidavits showing that the judgment had been suffered through “mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect.” Under these circumstances it is an abuse of discretion to refuse to reopen [422] the case and allow the defense to be made. Sec. 2882, Stats.; Bloor v. Smith, 112 Wis. 340, 87 N. W. 870.

The court was entirely justified in imposing motion costs. Such costs, not exceeding $10, may be allowed on any motion. Sec. 2924, Stats. The hearing of an appeal from the civil court to the circuit court is brought on by motion. Sub. 4, sec. 28, ch. 549, Laws 1909.

Under the present statute regulating appeals to this court the order of the circuit court before us would not be appeal-able because it simply reverses an order of the civil court. Sec. 3069, Stats., as amended by sec. 9, ch. 219, Laws 1915.

By the Court. — Order affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Winternitz v. Schmidt, 154 N.W. 626, 161 Wis. 421, 1915 Wisc. LEXIS 229 (Wis. 1915).

154 N.W. 626 (Winternitz v. Schmidt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lemon v. Aronson
164 N.W. 820 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1917)
Concrete Steel Co. v. Illinois Surety Co.
157 N.W. 543 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1916)