Winter, Wolff & Co. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Winter, Wolff & Co. v. United States

57 Cust. Ct. 798

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedJuly 28, 1966

DocketNo. P66/174; No. P66/175

StatusPublished

This text of 57 Cust. Ct. 798 (Winter, Wolff & Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Winter, Wolff & Co. v. United States, 57 Cust. Ct. 798 (cusc 1966).

Pincite

Opinion

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the issue involved in the foregoing protests is similar in all material respects to that in Amerlux Steel Products Corp. et al. v. United States (52 Cust. Ct. 83, C.D. 2441), and that the merchandise is similar in all material respects to the galvanized butt-welded steel tubes, pipes, etc., the subject of Winter, Wolff & Co., Inc. v. United States (54 Cust. Ct. 342, Abstract 69132), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the issue involved in the foregoing protests is similar in all material respects to that in Amerlux Steel Products Corp. et al. v. United States (52 Cust. Ct. 83, C.D. 2441), and that the merchandise is similar in all material respects to the galvanized butt-welded steel tubes, pipes, etc., the subject of Winter, Wolff & Co., Inc. v. United States (54 Cust. Ct. 342, Abstract 69132), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

57 Cust. Ct. 798, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/winter-wolff-co-v-united-states-cusc-1966.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack