Winter, Wolff & Co. v. United States
57 Cust. Ct. 798
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Winter, Wolff & Co. v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 54 Cust. Ct. 173 →
Opinion
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the issue involved in the foregoing protests is similar in all material respects to that in Amerlux Steel Products Corp. et al. v. United States (52 Cust. Ct. 83, C.D. 2441), and that the merchandise is similar in all material respects to the galvanized butt-welded steel tubes, pipes, etc., the subject of Winter, Wolff & Co., Inc. v. United States (54 Cust. Ct. 342, Abstract 69132), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Winter, Wolff & Co. v. United States, 57 Cust. Ct. 798 (cusc 1966).
57 Cust. Ct. 798 (Winter, Wolff & Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Amerlux Steel Products Corp. v. United States
52 Cust. Ct. 83 (U.S. Customs Court, 1964)
Winter, Wolff & Co. v. United States
54 Cust. Ct. 342 (U.S. Customs Court, 1965)