Winter, Wolff & Co. v. United States

54 Cust. Ct. 342
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedMarch 11, 1965
DocketNo. 69132; protest 62/10305 (Los Angeles)
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 54 Cust. Ct. 342 (Winter, Wolff & Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Winter, Wolff & Co. v. United States, 54 Cust. Ct. 342 (cusc 1965).

Opinion

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the issue is similar in all material respects to that involved in Amerlux Steel Products Corp. et al. v. United States (52 Cust. Ct. 83, C.D. 2441), wherein it was held that the galvanization or coating of the imported wire fencing there involved should not be removed in determining the diameter of the wire, and that it was not proper to remove the galvanized material from the subject merchandise in determining its diameter, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Winter, Wolff & Co. v. United States
57 Cust. Ct. 798 (U.S. Customs Court, 1966)
Ataka California, Ltd. v. United States
57 Cust. Ct. 797 (U.S. Customs Court, 1966)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
54 Cust. Ct. 342, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/winter-wolff-co-v-united-states-cusc-1965.