Winter, Wolff & Co. v. United States
This text of 54 Cust. Ct. 342 (Winter, Wolff & Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion by
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the issue is similar in all material respects to that involved in Amerlux Steel Products Corp. et al. v. United States (52 Cust. Ct. 83, C.D. 2441), wherein it was held that the galvanization or coating of the imported wire fencing there involved should not be removed in determining the diameter of the wire, and that it was not proper to remove the galvanized material from the subject merchandise in determining its diameter, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
54 Cust. Ct. 342, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/winter-wolff-co-v-united-states-cusc-1965.