Winter v. Fay

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided May 28, 2025·No. 1:24-cv-07643·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK PAMELA J. WINTER, Plaintiff, -against- RICHARD FAY, ESQ.; ASHLEY M PASCUZZI ESQ.; ANTHONY ROONEY 24-CV-7643 (LTS) ESQ.; MOHAMED NJOUA; JUDGE ORDER OF DISMISSAL THOMAS QUINONES, J.S.C.; TIMOTHY IDONI; G. JEFFREY RECORDS, JR.; SCOTT SMITH; TODD DOBSON; KEN CLARK; LAUREN EGER; MADISON GRASPO; SUSAN RICHARDSON, Defendants. LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN, Chief United States District Judge: By order dated January 29, 2025, the Court dismissed the complaint and granted Plaintiff 30 days to replead her claims in an amended complaint. (ECF 7.) That order specified that failure to comply would result in dismissal of the complaint and entry of civil judgment. Plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint. Accordingly, the complaint, filed in forma pauperis (IFP) under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1), is dismissed under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Cf. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962) (holding that an appellant demonstrates good faith when he seeks review of a nonfrivolous issue). The Clerk of Court is directed to enter civil judgment dismissing this action. SO ORDERED. Dated: May 27, 2025 New York, New York

/s/ Laura Taylor Swain LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN Chief United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Winter v. Fay, (S.D.N.Y. 2025).

Winter v. Fay (Winter v. Fay) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Coppedge v. United States
369 U.S. 438 (Supreme Court, 1962)