Winslow v. Lott

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Winslow v. Lott

272 A.D.2d 406, 707 N.Y.S.2d 481, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5060

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 8, 2000

StatusPublished

Cited by6 cases

This text of 272 A.D.2d 406 (Winslow v. Lott) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Winslow v. Lott, 272 A.D.2d 406, 707 N.Y.S.2d 481, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5060 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

—In a child custody proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, the father appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Family Court, Queens County (Croiter, Ref.), dated October 30, 1998, as awarded custody of the two daughters of the parties to the mother.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs and disbursements.

The Family Court properly weighed all of the relevant factors in determining this custody dispute. Although there was evidence that the father was a good parent, the court determined that it was in the best interest of the children to remain with their mother, who was more sensitive to their emotional needs and likely to encourage their relationship with their father. In addition, the girls are very attached to their step-siblings with whom they have lived for their entire lives. The Family Court is in the best position to evaluate the testimony, character, temperament, and sincerity of the parties, and its findings are entitled to great weight. Since the Family Court’s determination has a sound and substantial basis in the record, it will not be disturbed (see, Matter of Louise E. S. v W. Stephen S., 64 NY2d 946; Klat v Klat, 176 AD2d 922; Matter of Coyne v Coyne, 150 AD2d 573). Bracken, J. P., Sullivan, Altman and Krausman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In a child custody proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, the father appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Family Court, Queens County (Croiter, Ref.), dated October 30, 1998, as awarded custody of the two daughters of the parties to the mother.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs and disbursements.

The Family Court properly weighed all of the relevant factors in determining this custody dispute. Although there was evidence that the father was a good parent, the court determined that it was in the best interest of the children to remain with their mother, who was more sensitive to their emotional needs and likely to encourage their relationship with their father. In addition, the girls are very attached to their step-siblings with whom they have lived for their entire lives. The Family Court is in the best position to evaluate the testimony, character, temperament, and sincerity of the parties, and its findings are entitled to great weight. Since the Family Court’s determination has a sound and substantial basis in the record, it will not be disturbed (see, Matter of Louise E. S. v W. Stephen S., 64 NY2d 946; Klat v Klat, 176 AD2d 922; Matter of Coyne v Coyne, 150 AD2d 573). Bracken, J. P., Sullivan, Altman and Krausman, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

272 A.D.2d 406, 707 N.Y.S.2d 481, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5060, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/winslow-v-lott-nyappdiv-2000.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack