Pendleton v. Pendleton

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Pendleton v. Pendleton

285 A.D.2d 596, 728 N.Y.S.2d 384, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7610

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 23, 2001·Published

Opinion

—In a child custody proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, the mother appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Family Court, Dutchess County (Forman, J.), entered April 6, 2000, as, after a hearing, granted the father’s petition for custody of the parties’ son.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

The record establishes that there was a sound and substantial basis for the Family Court’s decision to grant the father custody of the parties’ son (see, Matter of Winslow v Lott, 272 AD2d 406; Santoro v Santoro, 224 AD2d 510). Ritter, J. P., Friedmann, Luciano and Smith, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In a child custody proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, the mother appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Family Court, Dutchess County (Forman, J.), entered April 6, 2000, as, after a hearing, granted the father’s petition for custody of the parties’ son.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

The record establishes that there was a sound and substantial basis for the Family Court’s decision to grant the father custody of the parties’ son (see, Matter of Winslow v Lott, 272 AD2d 406; Santoro v Santoro, 224 AD2d 510). Ritter, J. P., Friedmann, Luciano and Smith, JJ., concur.

Pendleton v. Pendleton, 285 A.D.2d 596, 728 N.Y.S.2d 384, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7610 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

285 A.D.2d 596 (Pendleton v. Pendleton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related