Winona, Warsaw, Elkhart & South Bend Traction Co. v. Collins

69 N.E. 998, 162 Ind. 693, 1904 Ind. LEXIS 102
CourtIndiana Supreme Court
DecidedFebruary 2, 1904
DocketNo. 20,169
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 69 N.E. 998 (Winona, Warsaw, Elkhart & South Bend Traction Co. v. Collins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Winona, Warsaw, Elkhart & South Bend Traction Co. v. Collins, 69 N.E. 998, 162 Ind. 693, 1904 Ind. LEXIS 102 (Ind. 1904).

Opinion

Hadley, J.

Appeal from an interlocutory order appointing a receiver. It appears from the record that on July 13, 1903, appellee, without filing any complaint in the Elkhart Circuit Court, or causing or requesting any summons or other process to be issued out of said court, presented to the judge of said court at his chambers in the city of Lagrange, Lagrange county, Indiana, his verified petition for the appointment of a receiver to take charge of all the assets, books, papers, maps, franchises, surveys, documents, and all other property of the appellant. It is averred in the petition that appellant is an Indiana corporation and has its principal office in Elkhart, Indiana. The petition demands no money judgment, and no other legal or equitable remedy beyond the appointment of a receiver. It sets forth causes for the appointment of a receiver without notice. In the absence of the defendant the judge ap[694]*694pointed, a receiver upon the verified petition in accordance with the prayer thereof, approved the receiver’s bond, and administered the oath of office, and so far as anything appears by this record that was a final disposition of the cause.

There was no action commenced and pending in the circuit court to which the application for a receiver was ancillary, hence the judge had no jurisdiction to appoint a receiver. The ease is fully ruled by Alexandria Gas Co. et al. v. Irish, 152 Ind. 535, and oases there cited.

The order appointing a receiver is therefore reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Johann, Sr. v. Johann, Jr.
111 N.E.2d 473 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1953)
District No. 21 United Mine Workers of America v. Bourland
277 S.W. 546 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1925)
Tucker v. Tucker
142 N.E. 11 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1924)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
69 N.E. 998, 162 Ind. 693, 1904 Ind. LEXIS 102, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/winona-warsaw-elkhart-south-bend-traction-co-v-collins-ind-1904.