Winkler v. Carey

721 N.W.2d 589, 477 Mich. 873

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Winkler v. Carey. Read the opinion of the Court — 474 Mich. 1118 →

Michigan Supreme Court·Decided September 27, 2006·No. 130300·Published

Opinion

721 N.W.2d 589 (2006)

Cynthia J. WINKLER, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
William L. CAREY, Defendant-Appellee.

Docket No. 130300. COA No. 255193.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

September 27, 2006.

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court's order of April 26, 2006 is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was entered erroneously.

TAYLOR, C.J., CORRIGAN, and YOUNG, JJ., would grant reconsideration.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

721 N.W.2d 589 (2006)

Cynthia J. WINKLER, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
William L. CAREY, Defendant-Appellee.

Docket No. 130300. COA No. 255193.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

September 27, 2006.

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court's order of April 26, 2006 is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was entered erroneously.

TAYLOR, C.J., CORRIGAN, and YOUNG, JJ., would grant reconsideration.

Winkler v. Carey, 721 N.W.2d 589, 477 Mich. 873 (Mich. 2006).

Pincite

721 N.W.2d 589 (Winkler v. Carey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Cynthia J. WINKLER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. William L. CAREY, Defendant-Appellee.

Cynthia J. WINKLER, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
William L. CAREY, Defendant-Appellee.