Winkler v. Carey
This text of 712 N.W.2d 451 (Winkler v. Carey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Cynthia J. WINKLER, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
William L. CAREY, Defendant-Appellee.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 1, 2005 *452 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REVERSE the judgment of the Court of Appeals for the reasons stated by Judge O'Connell's dissenting opinion, and REMAND to the Roscommon Circuit Court for further proceedings not inconsistent with this order.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
712 N.W.2d 451, 474 Mich. 1118, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/winkler-v-carey-mich-2006.