Wingard v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Wingard v. State

161 So. 107, 26 Ala. App. 383, 1934 Ala. App. LEXIS 158

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedDecember 18, 1934

Docket4 Div. 75.

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 161 So. 107 (Wingard v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wingard v. State, 161 So. 107, 26 Ala. App. 383, 1934 Ala. App. LEXIS 158 (Ala. Ct. App. 1934).

Pincite

Opinions

SAMFORD, Judge.

The record in this case presents no new or novel questions of law. The evidence, with slight conflict, discloses a willful, deliberate, and premeditated murder. The jury after having all the evidence and the charge of the court rendered a verdict convicting the defendant of manslaughter in the first decree.

The rulings of the court on the admission of evidence were free from prejudicial error-, and the charges refused to defendant were either abstract or were covered fully by the court in his oral charge.

We find no error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI