Wingard v. State

161 So. 107, 26 Ala. App. 383, 1934 Ala. App. LEXIS 158
Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided December 18, 1934·No. 4 Div. 75.·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinions

SAMFORD, Judge.

The record in this case presents no new or novel questions of law. The evidence, with slight conflict, discloses a willful, deliberate, and premeditated murder. The jury after having all the evidence and the charge of the court rendered a verdict convicting the defendant of manslaughter in the first decree.

The rulings of the court on the admission of evidence were free from prejudicial error-, and the charges refused to defendant were either abstract or were covered fully by the court in his oral charge.

We find no error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wingard v. State, 161 So. 107, 26 Ala. App. 383, 1934 Ala. App. LEXIS 158 (Ala. Ct. App. 1934).

161 So. 107 (Wingard v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wingard v. State
161 So. 107 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1935)