Windham v. State

14 So. 3d 255, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 10071, 2009 WL 2190216
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 24, 2009·No. 5D08-2127·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

Jason Windham timely appeals his conviction by jury verdict for aggravated assault with a deadly weapon and twenty-year minimum mandatory prison sentence imposed pursuant to the 10-20-Life statute.1 We find no error in the trial court’s denial of Windham’s motion to suppress his confession, and find all other claimed errors related to Windham’s conviction to be harmless in light of his confession. See State v. DiGuilio, 491 So.2d 1129 (Fla.1986).

AFFIRMED.

GRIFFIN and TORPY, JJ., concur. LAWSON, J., concurring specially, with opinion.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Windham v. State, 14 So. 3d 255, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 10071, 2009 WL 2190216 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).

14 So. 3d 255 (Windham v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Windham v. State
14 So. 3d 255 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2009)