Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Windham v. State

Windham v. State

14 So. 3d 255, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 10071, 2009 WL 2190216
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 24, 2009
Docket5D08-2127
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 14 So. 3d 255 (Windham v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Windham v. State, 14 So. 3d 255, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 10071, 2009 WL 2190216 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

Jason Windham timely appeals his conviction by jury verdict for aggravated assault with a deadly weapon and twenty-year minimum mandatory prison sentence imposed pursuant to the 10-20-Life statute.1 We find no error in the trial court’s denial of Windham’s motion to suppress his confession, and find all other claimed errors related to Windham’s conviction to be harmless in light of his confession. See State v. DiGuilio, 491 So.2d 1129 (Fla.1986).

AFFIRMED.

GRIFFIN and TORPY, JJ., concur. LAWSON, J., concurring specially, with opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Windham v. State
14 So. 3d 255 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
14 So. 3d 255, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 10071, 2009 WL 2190216, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/windham-v-state-fladistctapp-2009.