Winchell v. . Scott
21 N.E. 1065, 114 N.Y. 640, 69 Sickels 640, 1889 N.Y. LEXIS 1173
Opinion
reads for affirmance.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Winchell v. . Scott, 21 N.E. 1065, 114 N.Y. 640, 69 Sickels 640, 1889 N.Y. LEXIS 1173 (N.Y. 1889).
21 N.E. 1065 (Winchell v. . Scott) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Slider v. Winifrede Coal Co.
11 Ohio App. 130 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1919)
Henningsen v. Tonopah & Goldfield Railroad
33 Nev. 208 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1910)
Harris Lumber Co. v. Wheeler Lumber Co.
115 S.W. 168 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1908)
Ross-Meehan Foundry Co. v. Royer Wheel Co.
113 Tenn. 370 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1904)
Contractors & Builders' Supply Co. v. Alta Portland Cement Co.
4 Ohio C.C. (n.s.) 225 (Logan Circuit Court, 1904)
Kokomo Strawboard Co. v. Inman
31 N.E. 248 (New York Court of Appeals, 1892)
Goodsell v. Western Union Telegraph Co.
26 Jones & S. 26 (The Superior Court of New York City, 1890)
Goodsell v. Western Union Telegraph Co.
9 N.Y.S. 425 (Superior Court of New York, 1890)