Wimberly, Christopher Eugene
This text of Wimberly, Christopher Eugene (Wimberly, Christopher Eugene) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-64,017-05
EX PARTE CHRISTOPHER E. WIMBERLY, Applicant
ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. 54705-E TH IN THE 27 DISTRICT COURT FROM BELL COUNTY
Per curiam.
ORDER
Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the
clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex
parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of
aggravated robbery and sentenced to fifty years’ imprisonment. The Third Court of Appeals
affirmed the conviction. Wimberly v. State, No. 03-03-00726-CR (Tex. App.—Austin Oct. 13,
2005)(not designated for publication).
Applicant contends that he is actually innocent. He bases his claim on the confession of
another person. We believe that in cases such as this one, before we make the important decision
of whether Applicant is entitled to relief, the record should be more fully developed. The trial -2-
court shall therefore conduct a live evidentiary hearing on the matter at which, at a minimum, the
confessing person shall be called to testify.
It appears that Applicant is not represented by habeas counsel. The trial court, within 30
days of the date of this order, shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is
indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an attorney to
represent Applicant at the evidentiary hearing. TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 26.04.
The trial court shall make findings as to the credibility of the witness’ testimony,
including his confession. The court shall make further findings of fact regarding the
circumstances surrounding the confession. The trial court shall make findings as to whether
Applicant could have presented the information contained in the confessor’s affidavit prior to the
date Applicant filed his prior habeas applications. The trial court shall specifically weigh the
evidence of Applicant’s guilt, including all of the testimony at trial, against the new evidence of
innocence. See Ex parte Tuley, 109 S.W.3d 388, 393 (Tex. Crim. App. 2002). The trial court
shall enter findings of fact as to the credibility of each witness and as to whether Applicant is
entitled to relief.
This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues.
The issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. A supplemental transcript containing
the transcription of the court reporter’s notes from the live evidentiary hearing and a copy of the
exhibits admitted, along with the trial court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law and a copy
of the trial record, including the clerk’s record and a transcription of the reporter’s record of the
trial, shall be forwarded to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of
time shall be obtained from this Court. -3-
Delivered: March 4, 2015 Do not publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Wimberly, Christopher Eugene, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wimberly-christopher-eugene-texcrimapp-2015.