Wimauma Produce, Inc. v. William P. Hearn Produce Co.

775 So. 2d 1011, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 471, 2001 WL 55315
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 24, 2001
DocketNo. 3D00-2765
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 775 So. 2d 1011 (Wimauma Produce, Inc. v. William P. Hearn Produce Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wimauma Produce, Inc. v. William P. Hearn Produce Co., 775 So. 2d 1011, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 471, 2001 WL 55315 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the order granting defendant’s motion to transfer venue in this cause. “[W]here venue is proper in more [1012]*1012than one county, the choice of forum rests with a plaintiff and will not lightly be set aside.” Government Employees Ins. Co. v. Burns, 672 So.2d 834, 835 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996). No basis to set aside plaintiffs choice of forum has been demonstrated.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Commodore Realty, Inc. v. Classic Carpet & Tile, Inc.
843 So. 2d 359 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
775 So. 2d 1011, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 471, 2001 WL 55315, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wimauma-produce-inc-v-william-p-hearn-produce-co-fladistctapp-2001.