Wimauma Produce, Inc. v. William P. Hearn Produce Co.
775 So. 2d 1011, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 471, 2001 WL 55315
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 24, 2001·No. No. 3D00-2765·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
We reverse the order granting defendant’s motion to transfer venue in this cause. “[W]here venue is proper in more [1012]*1012than one county, the choice of forum rests with a plaintiff and will not lightly be set aside.” Government Employees Ins. Co. v. Burns, 672 So.2d 834, 835 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996). No basis to set aside plaintiffs choice of forum has been demonstrated.
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Wimauma Produce, Inc. v. William P. Hearn Produce Co., 775 So. 2d 1011, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 471, 2001 WL 55315 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).
775 So. 2d 1011 (Wimauma Produce, Inc. v. William P. Hearn Produce Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Commodore Realty, Inc. v. Classic Carpet & Tile, Inc.
843 So. 2d 359 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)