Commodore Realty, Inc. v. Classic Carpet & Tile, Inc.
This text of 843 So. 2d 359 (Commodore Realty, Inc. v. Classic Carpet & Tile, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
COMMODORE REALTY, INC., Appellant,
v.
CLASSIC CARPET & TILE, INC., et al., Appellees.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
David Harris Singer, Hollywood, and Maureen O'Donnell, for appellant.
Vernis & Bowling and James R. (Jack) Bridges, Islamorada, for appellees.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and GODERICH and GREEN, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
The trial court abused its discretion by granting the defendants' motion to transfer venue, pursuant to section 47.122, Florida Statutes (2001), where the defendants failed to meet their burden of establishing "before the trial court that either substantial inconvenience or undue expense requires a change for the convenience of the parties or witnesses." Safety Nat'l Cas. Corp. v. Florida Mun. Ins. Trust, 818 So.2d 612, 613 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002). Therefore, we reverse the order transferring venue. See Wimauma Produce, Inc. *360 v. William P. Hearn Produce Co., 775 So.2d 1011 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001).
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
843 So. 2d 359, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 6157, 2003 WL 1969310, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commodore-realty-inc-v-classic-carpet-tile-inc-fladistctapp-2003.