Wilson v. Warden, Franklin Medical Center

District Court, S.D. Ohio·Decided June 18, 2020·No. 3:19-cv-00266·Unknown

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON

LAWRENCE EARL WILSON,

Petitioner, : Case No. 3:19-cv-266

- vs - District Judge Thomas M. Rose Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz

RHONDA RICHARDS, Warden, Franklin Medical Center,

: Respondent. DECISION AND ORDER

This habeas corpus action is before the Court on Petitioner’s Motion for Extension of Time to File Notice of Appeal and Motion for Certificate of Appealability (ECF No. 16). The order Petitioner wishes to appeal is the Order denying release on personal recognizance and stay of the state court judgment filed May 8, 2020 (ECF No. 15). Petitioner appears to believe that order is subject to interlocutory appeal to the Sixth Circuit, but he is mistaken. Because a motion for release pending litigation is a non-dispositive pretrial matter, it was decided in the first instance by the undersigned. Because the parties have not unanimously consented to plenary magistrate judge jurisdiction in this case, Petitioner’s first recourse for relief from the order must be to the assigned District Judge, Judge Thomas M. Rose. Ambrose v. Welch, 729 F.2d 1084, 1085 (6th Cir. 1984)(per curiam). Based on the difficulties getting mail to Wilson, his time to file objections to the order denying bail is extended to and including July 6, 2020. The Clerk will detach and file separately the Motion for Certificate of Appealability which the Court will address in conjunction with the merits of the appeal to Judge Rose.

June 18, 2020.

s/ Michael R. Merz United States Magistrate Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wilson v. Warden, Franklin Medical Center, (S.D. Ohio 2020).

Wilson v. Warden, Franklin Medical Center (Wilson v. Warden, Franklin Medical Center) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related